🔗 Share this article

The President had a cautionary message for Democrats.

In the near future he will determine what "Democrat agencies" he would cut and whether those reductions would be temporary or permanent.

He said the federal closure, which started this week, had given him an "unprecedented opportunity."

"Today I'm meeting with the budget director, known for his role in Project 2025," he wrote on his Truth Social website on Thursday.

The Project 2025 Connection

Vought, the director of the White House Office of Management and Budget, may not be widely known to the public.

But the 2025 initiative, a conservative blueprint for governing put together primarily by previous administration figures like Vought when the GOP was not in control, played a significant role during the recent election cycle.

The comprehensive policy guide contained suggestions for dramatic reductions in the size of federal government, expanded presidential authority, strict border controls, a nationwide abortion ban and other components of an far-right social program.

It was often highlighted by Democratic presidential nominee the former vice president, as Trump's "dangerous plan" for the coming years if he was to be elected.

During the campaign, trying to calm undecided voters, the president attempted to separate himself from the proposal.

"I know nothing about the 2025 plan," Trump wrote in mid-2024. "I disagree with some of the things they're saying and some of the things they're saying are absolutely ridiculous and abysmal."

Shifting Approach

Currently, though, the president is employing the conservative blueprint as leverage to get Democrats to agree to his budgetary demands.

And he is holding up Vought, who authored a chapter on the use of executive power, as a kind of budgetary angel of death, prepared to make cuts to government programmes important to the opposition party.

In case that particular metaphor wasn't clear, on Thursday night the president posted an AI-generated parody music video on his social platform with Vought portrayed as the grim reaper, set to altered lyrics of Blue Oyster Cult's classic song.

Washington Responses

On Capitol Hill, Republican leaders have repeated the president's description of Vought as the administration enforcer.

"We have no say over his actions," GOP Senate leader the senator said. "This is the risk of closing federal operations and handing the keys to the budget director."

Senator Mike Lee of Utah told the news network that Vought had been "getting ready for this situation since puberty."

That may be a bit of an overstatement, but Vought, who cut his teeth as a Capit Hill aide for Republican budget hawks and helped run the advocacy division of the conservative think tank, has extensive background examining the complexities of government spending.

The Numbers Expert in the Administration

He served for twelve months as the assistant head of the federal budget agency during the initial administration, advancing to become its director in 2019.

Unlike many who worked for the president during that initial term, Vought had staying power - and was promptly reappointed as head of the budget office when Trump returned recently.

"Many individuals who didn't come back embody outdated approaches," said Richard Stern, a think tank official who, similar to the director, began his career in conservative congressional budget circles.

"The director was innovative in the first term and perfectly positioned now."

While the director doesn't tend to avoid controversial statements – he previously stated that he hoped to become "the person who crushes the bureaucratic establishment" – he doesn't exactly look the part of a Republican bogeyman.

Thinning hair and wearing glasses, with a greying beard, the director's remarks typically have the controlled rhythm of a numbers expert or academic.

He lacks the narrow-eyed glower and heated language of another advisor, a different presidential consultant who manages administration border measures.

Seizing Opportunity in Shutdown

Currently the president has warned to unleash Vought at a moment when, because of the regulatory uncertainty created by the federal closure, their reductions could become more extensive and lasting than those implemented previously.

Ex-congressional leader Newt Gingrich, a participant in the major closure battles of the nineties, told NPR that the director and his staff have been preparing for exactly these kind of circumstances while they were in the opposition period during the Biden years.

"They all knew a government shutdown was likely," he said. "I think they had decided early on that you're only going to get the level of transformation they want if you're very tough and very determined and every chance you get, you take the opportunity."

The opportunity the closure offers for budget-cutters like Vought is that, without congressionally approved funding, the federal operations continue in a legal grey area with reduced spending constraints.

The White House can, in theory, cut budgets and personnel more extensively than it could previously, when expenditures followed standard funding levels.

And while permanent layoffs would still have to abide by a two-month warning, Vought could start the countdown when he, and Trump, so choose.

Present Measures and Coming Conflicts

Vought already has announced significant construction initiatives in the largest city and Chicago are paused, referring to required a examination of potentially illegal racial hiring practices - a examination that he said cannot occur during the shutdown.

He's also cancelled almost eight billion dollars in renewable energy initiatives across 16 states, each supporting the Democratic candidate, Trump's opponent, in last year's presidential race.

Opposition parties and government employee organizations have vowed to challenge these cuts in the legal system and claimed that the president is issuing largely empty threats to try to force them to giving up their opposition.

Many economists have pointed out that the administration cutbacks have been paired with other spending-increasing measures, which could undercut their attacks on the opposition for being the group favoring excessive spending.

"Republicans are increasing spending in other areas and cutting taxes at the same time," an economics professor, an academic expert at the Columbia University School of Business noted.

"The notion that they're committed to financial responsibility is not borne out by their actions."

Political Risks

Certain GOP legislators have voiced worry that the visible enthusiasm with which Trump is touting director-mandated reductions could turn public opinion against them if the closure continues.

Republicans have been warning of the dire consequences of the closure on public operations - as part of a strategy to portray Democrats as the responsible party.

Doing so while applauding the methods the administration is slashing programmes could derail those efforts.

"The director is less politically aware than his boss," The legislator the senator, a participant in the efficiency group, told the media outlet.

"Our party have never possessed this much ethical advantage on a government funding bill in our lives… I just don't see why we would squander it, which I think is the risk of being aggressive with executive power in this moment."

The North Carolina senator, a North Carolina senator who has decided against campaigning for re-election next year, warns that administration officials "must exercise caution" in how they present any new cuts.

The Doge-directed layoffs and programme cuts were largely unpopular, according to polling data, negatively affecting the leader's popularity.

A repetition of this could be perilous.

According to Stern, though, the White House, and Vought, may view the long-term benefits as worth the immediate difficulties.

"For Russ, for myself, for anyone working on fiscal matters, this country is going bankrupt,"